Ecuador vs Serbia and Montenegro: AFOLU — Direct emissions
AFOLU — Direct emissions over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 9.23 kt against 9.03 kt in Ecuador, a difference of 0.2 kt.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 75th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 74th of 197 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.71 kt | 8.39 kt | 2.32 kt | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 11.47 kt | 8.44 kt | 3.03 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — direct emissions, Ecuador or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 9.23 kt against 9.03 kt in Ecuador as of 2005.
- What is the difference in afolu — direct emissions between Ecuador and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0.2 kt, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for afolu — direct emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 75th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 74th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf