Israel vs Jordan: AFOLU — Direct emissions
AFOLU — Direct emissions over time
- Israel
- Jordan
How they compare
Israel currently reports 2.35 kt against 1.93 kt in Jordan, a difference of 0.42 kt.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.2 times Jordan's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 119th and Jordan ranks 121st of 197 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.12 kt | 1.08 kt | 1.04 kt | Israel |
| 2000s | 2.26 kt | 1.05 kt | 1.21 kt | Israel |
| 2010s | 2.45 kt | 1.51 kt | 0.9421 kt | Israel |
| 2020s | 2.39 kt | 1.75 kt | 0.6369 kt | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — direct emissions, Israel or Jordan?
- Israel, at 2.35 kt against 1.93 kt in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — direct emissions between Israel and Jordan?
- 0.42 kt, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Jordan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Jordan rank globally for afolu — direct emissions?
- Israel ranks 119th and Jordan ranks 121st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf