Bangladesh vs Chad: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Bangladesh
- Chad
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 2,452 kt against 2,423 kt in Chad, a difference of 29 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 15th and Chad ranks 16th of 256 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,078 kt | 659.25 kt | 1,418 kt | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 2,216 kt | 951.04 kt | 1,265 kt | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 2,362 kt | 1,558 kt | 804.02 kt | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 2,439 kt | 2,240 kt | 199.65 kt | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Bangladesh or Chad?
- Bangladesh, at 2,452 kt against 2,423 kt in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Bangladesh and Chad?
- 29 kt, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Chad?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Chad rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Bangladesh ranks 15th and Chad ranks 16th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf