Bangladesh vs Mexico: AFOLU — Emissions (CH4)
AFOLU — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Bangladesh
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 2,545 kt against 2,452 kt in Bangladesh, a difference of 93 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mexico ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 15th and Mexico ranks 14th of 256 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,078 kt | 2,256 kt | 177.95 kt | Mexico |
| 2000s | 2,216 kt | 2,226 kt | 9.96 kt | Mexico |
| 2010s | 2,362 kt | 2,348 kt | 14.84 kt | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 2,439 kt | 2,515 kt | 75.71 kt | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Bangladesh or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 2,545 kt against 2,452 kt in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Bangladesh and Mexico?
- 93 kt, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Mexico?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Mexico rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Bangladesh ranks 15th and Mexico ranks 14th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf