Belarus vs Egypt: AFOLU — Emissions (CH4)
AFOLU — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Belarus
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 434.37 kt against 357.97 kt in Belarus, a difference of 76.4 kt.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 75th and Egypt ranks 72nd of 256 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 475.66 kt | 533.69 kt | 58.04 kt | Egypt |
| 2000s | 362.5 kt | 651.04 kt | 288.54 kt | Egypt |
| 2010s | 371.27 kt | 593.84 kt | 222.57 kt | Egypt |
| 2020s | 361.72 kt | 395.67 kt | 33.95 kt | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Belarus or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 434.37 kt against 357.97 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Belarus and Egypt?
- 76.4 kt, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Egypt?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Egypt rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 75th and Egypt ranks 72nd of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf