Belarus vs Nicaragua: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 359.25 kt against 357.97 kt in Belarus, a difference of 1.28 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 60th and Nicaragua ranks 59th of 221 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 475.66 kt | 187.52 kt | 288.13 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 362.5 kt | 227.18 kt | 135.32 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 371.27 kt | 298.38 kt | 72.89 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | 361.72 kt | 342.32 kt | 19.41 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Belarus or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 359.25 kt against 357.97 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Belarus and Nicaragua?
- 1.28 kt, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nicaragua?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Nicaragua rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 60th and Nicaragua ranks 59th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf