Belize vs Kuwait: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Belize
- Kuwait
How they compare
Belize currently reports 9.31 kt against 8.19 kt in Kuwait, a difference of 1.12 kt.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.1 times Kuwait's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 163rd and Kuwait ranks 166th of 238 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.04 kt | 2.96 kt | 3.07 kt | Belize |
| 2000s | 6.37 kt | 4.99 kt | 1.38 kt | Belize |
| 2010s | 8.61 kt | 6.48 kt | 2.13 kt | Belize |
| 2020s | 8.56 kt | 8.11 kt | 0.4526 kt | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Belize or Kuwait?
- Belize, at 9.31 kt against 8.19 kt in Kuwait as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Belize and Kuwait?
- 1.12 kt, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Kuwait?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Kuwait rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Belize ranks 163rd and Kuwait ranks 166th of 238 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf