Botswana vs Morocco: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Botswana
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 281.74 kt against 280.79 kt in Botswana, a difference of 0.95 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Morocco ahead.
Botswana ranks 76th and Morocco ranks 75th of 238 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 210.81 kt | 232.09 kt | 21.27 kt | Morocco |
| 2000s | 179.76 kt | 252.51 kt | 72.74 kt | Morocco |
| 2010s | 180 kt | 287.69 kt | 107.69 kt | Morocco |
| 2020s | 222.81 kt | 297.99 kt | 75.18 kt | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Botswana or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 281.74 kt against 280.79 kt in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Botswana and Morocco?
- 0.95 kt, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Morocco?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Morocco rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Botswana ranks 76th and Morocco ranks 75th of 238 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf