Botswana vs Ukraine: AFOLU — Emissions (CH4)
AFOLU — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Botswana
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 286.88 kt against 280.79 kt in Botswana, a difference of 6.09 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 84th and Ukraine ranks 82nd of 256 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 210.54 kt | 1,642 kt | 1,431 kt | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 179.76 kt | 785.02 kt | 605.26 kt | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 180 kt | 482.95 kt | 302.95 kt | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 222.81 kt | 340.76 kt | 117.95 kt | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Botswana or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 286.88 kt against 280.79 kt in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Botswana and Ukraine?
- 6.09 kt, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Ukraine rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Botswana ranks 84th and Ukraine ranks 82nd of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf