Brunei vs Saint Lucia: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Brunei
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 0.8207 kt against 0.8195 kt in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.0012 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Brunei ahead.
Brunei ranks 199th and Saint Lucia ranks 201st of 256 countries.
Brunei has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.26 kt | 0.9282 kt | 6.33 kt | Brunei |
| 2000s | 1.16 kt | 0.8113 kt | 0.35 kt | Brunei |
| 2010s | 1.09 kt | 0.8414 kt | 0.2487 kt | Brunei |
| 2020s | 1.07 kt | 0.8207 kt | 0.2445 kt | Brunei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Brunei or Saint Lucia?
- Brunei, at 0.8207 kt against 0.8195 kt in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Brunei and Saint Lucia?
- 0.0012 kt, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Saint Lucia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Brunei and Saint Lucia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Brunei ranks 199th and Saint Lucia ranks 201st of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf