Bulgaria vs Rwanda: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Bulgaria
- Rwanda
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 66.48 kt against 66.06 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0.42 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 134th and Rwanda ranks 135th of 256 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 147.37 kt | 28.07 kt | 119.3 kt | Bulgaria |
| 2000s | 92.67 kt | 48.74 kt | 43.93 kt | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 73.38 kt | 66.97 kt | 6.41 kt | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 69.67 kt | 69.26 kt | 0.4091 kt | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Bulgaria or Rwanda?
- Bulgaria, at 66.48 kt against 66.06 kt in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Bulgaria and Rwanda?
- 0.42 kt, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Bulgaria and Rwanda rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Bulgaria ranks 134th and Rwanda ranks 135th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf