Burundi vs Norway: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Burundi
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 96.42 kt against 82.56 kt in Burundi, a difference of 13.86 kt.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Burundi's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 108th and Norway ranks 105th of 221 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.58 kt | 113.86 kt | 91.28 kt | Norway |
| 2000s | 24.44 kt | 106.67 kt | 82.23 kt | Norway |
| 2010s | 50.91 kt | 99.32 kt | 48.41 kt | Norway |
| 2020s | 78.24 kt | 98.44 kt | 20.19 kt | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Burundi or Norway?
- Norway, at 96.42 kt against 82.56 kt in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Burundi and Norway?
- 13.86 kt, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Norway?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Norway rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Burundi ranks 108th and Norway ranks 105th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf