Cameroon vs Ecuador: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Cameroon
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 311.81 kt against 299.59 kt in Cameroon, a difference of 12.22 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Cameroon ranks 64th and Ecuador ranks 62nd of 216 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 294.86 kt | 398.61 kt | 103.75 kt | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 323.44 kt | 398.69 kt | 75.25 kt | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 297.79 kt | 372.49 kt | 74.7 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 310.27 kt | 326.78 kt | 16.51 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Cameroon or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 311.81 kt against 299.59 kt in Cameroon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Cameroon and Ecuador?
- 12.22 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Ecuador?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cameroon and Ecuador rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Cameroon ranks 64th and Ecuador ranks 62nd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf