Chad vs Myanmar: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Chad
- Myanmar
How they compare
Chad currently reports 2,423 kt against 2,024 kt in Myanmar, a difference of 399 kt.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Myanmar ahead.
Chad ranks 15th and Myanmar ranks 18th of 216 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 659.25 kt | 1,842 kt | 1,183 kt | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 951.04 kt | 2,274 kt | 1,323 kt | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 1,558 kt | 2,480 kt | 921.16 kt | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 2,240 kt | 2,094 kt | 145.72 kt | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Chad or Myanmar?
- Chad, at 2,423 kt against 2,024 kt in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Chad and Myanmar?
- 399 kt, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Myanmar?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Myanmar rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Chad ranks 15th and Myanmar ranks 18th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf