China vs Pakistan: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- China
- Pakistan
How they compare
China currently reports 14,267 kt against 6,165 kt in Pakistan, a difference of 8,102 kt.
That makes China's figure about 2.3 times Pakistan's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 4th and Pakistan ranks 7th of 256 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14,358 kt | 2,675 kt | 11,682 kt | China |
| 2000s | 14,301 kt | 3,483 kt | 10,818 kt | China |
| 2010s | 13,654 kt | 4,724 kt | 8,930 kt | China |
| 2020s | 14,079 kt | 5,870 kt | 8,209 kt | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, China or Pakistan?
- China, at 14,267 kt against 6,165 kt in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between China and Pakistan?
- 8,102 kt, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Pakistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do China and Pakistan rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- China ranks 4th and Pakistan ranks 7th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf