Comoros vs Samoa: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Comoros
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 4.15 kt against 2.67 kt in Comoros, a difference of 1.48 kt.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.6 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 173rd and Samoa ranks 171st of 238 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.93 kt | 4.48 kt | 0.5531 kt | Samoa |
| 2000s | 3.34 kt | 4.93 kt | 1.59 kt | Samoa |
| 2010s | 2.63 kt | 5.44 kt | 2.81 kt | Samoa |
| 2020s | 2.66 kt | 4.08 kt | 1.42 kt | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Comoros or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 4.15 kt against 2.67 kt in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Comoros and Samoa?
- 1.48 kt, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Samoa?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Samoa rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Comoros ranks 173rd and Samoa ranks 171st of 238 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf