Congo vs El Salvador: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Congo
- El Salvador
How they compare
Congo currently reports 54.92 kt against 52.34 kt in El Salvador, a difference of 2.58 kt.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was El Salvador ahead.
Congo ranks 138th and El Salvador ranks 140th of 256 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 40.78 kt | 76.96 kt | 36.18 kt | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 47.01 kt | 81.77 kt | 34.75 kt | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 64.51 kt | 63.45 kt | 1.06 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 59.19 kt | 53.37 kt | 5.82 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Congo or El Salvador?
- Congo, at 54.92 kt against 52.34 kt in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Congo and El Salvador?
- 2.58 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and El Salvador?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Congo and El Salvador rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Congo ranks 138th and El Salvador ranks 140th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf