Congo vs Rwanda: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Congo
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 66.06 kt against 54.92 kt in Congo, a difference of 11.14 kt.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 125th of 238 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 40.78 kt | 28.07 kt | 12.71 kt | Congo |
| 2000s | 47.01 kt | 48.74 kt | 1.73 kt | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 64.51 kt | 66.97 kt | 2.46 kt | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 59.19 kt | 69.26 kt | 10.06 kt | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Congo or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 66.06 kt against 54.92 kt in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Congo and Rwanda?
- 11.14 kt, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Rwanda rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Congo ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 125th of 238 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf