Czechia vs Serbia: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Czechia
- Serbia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 115.07 kt against 109.14 kt in Serbia, a difference of 5.93 kt.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Czechia ranks 101st and Serbia ranks 103rd of 221 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 124.44 kt | 158.19 kt | 33.75 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 118.03 kt | 136.39 kt | 18.36 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 115.34 kt | 122.27 kt | 6.94 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Czechia or Serbia?
- Czechia, at 115.07 kt against 109.14 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Czechia and Serbia?
- 5.93 kt, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Serbia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Czechia ranks 101st and Serbia ranks 103rd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf