Dominica vs Malta: AFOLU — Emissions (CH4)
AFOLU — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Dominica
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 2.16 kt against 1.03 kt in Dominica, a difference of 1.13 kt.
That makes Malta's figure about 2.1 times Dominica's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 194th and Malta ranks 191st of 256 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.983 kt | 3.67 kt | 2.69 kt | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.984 kt | 3.31 kt | 2.32 kt | Malta |
| 2010s | 1.02 kt | 2.41 kt | 1.4 kt | Malta |
| 2020s | 1.03 kt | 2.19 kt | 1.16 kt | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Dominica or Malta?
- Malta, at 2.16 kt against 1.03 kt in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Dominica and Malta?
- 1.13 kt, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Malta?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Malta rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Dominica ranks 194th and Malta ranks 191st of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf