Fiji vs Luxembourg: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Fiji
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 16.23 kt against 14.33 kt in Fiji, a difference of 1.9 kt.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 168th and Luxembourg ranks 165th of 256 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.67 kt | 16.4 kt | 10.27 kt | Fiji |
| 2010s | 17.17 kt | 16.91 kt | 0.2641 kt | Fiji |
| 2020s | 12.67 kt | 16.62 kt | 3.94 kt | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Fiji or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 16.23 kt against 14.33 kt in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Fiji and Luxembourg?
- 1.9 kt, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Luxembourg rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Fiji ranks 168th and Luxembourg ranks 165th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf