Finland vs Togo: AFOLU — Emissions (CH4)
AFOLU — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Finland
- Togo
How they compare
Finland currently reports 78.05 kt against 69.93 kt in Togo, a difference of 8.12 kt.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 130th and Togo ranks 132nd of 256 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 120.7 kt | 38.37 kt | 82.33 kt | Finland |
| 2000s | 99.67 kt | 44.52 kt | 55.14 kt | Finland |
| 2010s | 90.78 kt | 55.9 kt | 34.89 kt | Finland |
| 2020s | 80.69 kt | 69.78 kt | 10.91 kt | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Finland or Togo?
- Finland, at 78.05 kt against 69.93 kt in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Finland and Togo?
- 8.12 kt, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Togo?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Togo rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Finland ranks 130th and Togo ranks 132nd of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf