Finland vs Tunisia: AFOLU — Emissions (CH4)
AFOLU — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Finland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 81.86 kt against 78.05 kt in Finland, a difference of 3.81 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 130th and Tunisia ranks 129th of 256 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 120.7 kt | 84.83 kt | 35.87 kt | Finland |
| 2000s | 99.67 kt | 93.39 kt | 6.28 kt | Finland |
| 2010s | 90.78 kt | 87.45 kt | 3.33 kt | Finland |
| 2020s | 80.69 kt | 82.68 kt | 1.99 kt | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Finland or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 81.86 kt against 78.05 kt in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Finland and Tunisia?
- 3.81 kt, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Tunisia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Tunisia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Finland ranks 130th and Tunisia ranks 129th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf