Greece vs Malawi: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Greece
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 175.42 kt against 153.36 kt in Greece, a difference of 22.06 kt.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Greece's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 92nd and Malawi ranks 89th of 216 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 186.8 kt | 51.33 kt | 135.46 kt | Greece |
| 2000s | 185.85 kt | 62.1 kt | 123.75 kt | Greece |
| 2010s | 172.12 kt | 114.12 kt | 58 kt | Greece |
| 2020s | 152.05 kt | 168.61 kt | 16.57 kt | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Greece or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 175.42 kt against 153.36 kt in Greece as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Greece and Malawi?
- 22.06 kt, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Malawi?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Greece and Malawi rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Greece ranks 92nd and Malawi ranks 89th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf