Israel vs Latvia: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Israel
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 36.48 kt against 25.67 kt in Israel, a difference of 10.81 kt.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Israel's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 129th of 221 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.03 kt | 77.53 kt | 59.5 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 18.73 kt | 43.06 kt | 24.33 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 22.81 kt | 41.57 kt | 18.77 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 25.35 kt | 38.64 kt | 13.3 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Israel or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 36.48 kt against 25.67 kt in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Israel and Latvia?
- 10.81 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Latvia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Israel ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 129th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf