Mali vs Uzbekistan: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Mali
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 996.34 kt against 986.03 kt in Mali, a difference of 10.31 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Mali ranks 39th and Uzbekistan ranks 38th of 256 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 458.96 kt | 417.72 kt | 41.24 kt | Mali |
| 2000s | 528.78 kt | 461.58 kt | 67.19 kt | Mali |
| 2010s | 735.15 kt | 773.42 kt | 38.26 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 943.85 kt | 963.24 kt | 19.4 kt | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Mali or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 996.34 kt against 986.03 kt in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Mali and Uzbekistan?
- 10.31 kt, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Uzbekistan rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Mali ranks 39th and Uzbekistan ranks 38th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf