Morocco vs Zimbabwe: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Morocco
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 281.74 kt against 271.23 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 10.51 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Morocco ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 216 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 232.09 kt | 259.33 kt | 27.24 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 252.51 kt | 265.59 kt | 13.08 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 287.69 kt | 271.41 kt | 16.28 kt | Morocco |
| 2020s | 297.99 kt | 256.44 kt | 41.55 kt | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Morocco or Zimbabwe?
- Morocco, at 281.74 kt against 271.23 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Morocco and Zimbabwe?
- 10.51 kt, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Morocco and Zimbabwe rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Morocco ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf