Mozambique vs Nepal: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Mozambique
- Nepal
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 637.73 kt against 616.38 kt in Nepal, a difference of 21.35 kt.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 61st and Nepal ranks 62nd of 256 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 534.58 kt | 618.34 kt | 83.76 kt | Nepal |
| 2000s | 687.38 kt | 694.96 kt | 7.57 kt | Nepal |
| 2010s | 830.58 kt | 793.44 kt | 37.14 kt | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 705.34 kt | 766.58 kt | 61.24 kt | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Mozambique or Nepal?
- Mozambique, at 637.73 kt against 616.38 kt in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Mozambique and Nepal?
- 21.35 kt, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Nepal?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Nepal rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Mozambique ranks 61st and Nepal ranks 62nd of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf