Myanmar vs Nigeria: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Myanmar
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 2,057 kt against 2,024 kt in Myanmar, a difference of 33 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 19th and Nigeria ranks 18th of 256 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,842 kt | 1,226 kt | 616.28 kt | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 2,274 kt | 1,367 kt | 906.43 kt | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 2,480 kt | 1,737 kt | 742.89 kt | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 2,094 kt | 2,029 kt | 65.12 kt | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Myanmar or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 2,057 kt against 2,024 kt in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Myanmar and Nigeria?
- 33 kt, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Nigeria?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Nigeria rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Myanmar ranks 19th and Nigeria ranks 18th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf