Myanmar vs Oceania: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Myanmar
- Oceania
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 5,607 kt against 2,024 kt in Myanmar, a difference of 3,583 kt.
That makes Oceania's figure about 2.8 times Myanmar's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Oceania has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 19th and Oceania ranks 22nd of 256 countries.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,842 kt | 5,303 kt | 3,461 kt | Oceania |
| 2000s | 2,274 kt | 5,190 kt | 2,916 kt | Oceania |
| 2010s | 2,480 kt | 4,794 kt | 2,314 kt | Oceania |
| 2020s | 2,094 kt | 4,313 kt | 2,219 kt | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Myanmar or Oceania?
- Oceania, at 5,607 kt against 2,024 kt in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Myanmar and Oceania?
- 3,583 kt, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Oceania?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Oceania rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Myanmar ranks 19th and Oceania ranks 22nd of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf