Myanmar vs Russia: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Myanmar
- Russia
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 2,024 kt against 2,007 kt in Russia, a difference of 17 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russia ahead.
Myanmar ranks 19th and Russia ranks 21st of 256 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 2 and Russia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,889 kt | 4,322 kt | 2,433 kt | Russia |
| 2000s | 2,274 kt | 2,619 kt | 345.36 kt | Russia |
| 2010s | 2,480 kt | 2,249 kt | 230.55 kt | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 2,094 kt | 2,051 kt | 42.92 kt | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Myanmar or Russia?
- Myanmar, at 2,024 kt against 2,007 kt in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Myanmar and Russia?
- 17 kt, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Russia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Russia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Myanmar ranks 19th and Russia ranks 21st of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf