Nauru vs Tokelau: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Nauru
- Tokelau
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0.0458 kt against 0.0352 kt in Tokelau, a difference of 0.0106 kt.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.3 times Tokelau's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 217th and Tokelau ranks 219th of 256 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0415 kt | 0.0152 kt | 0.0263 kt | Nauru |
| 2000s | 0.0432 kt | 0.0152 kt | 0.028 kt | Nauru |
| 2010s | 0.0454 kt | 0.0172 kt | 0.0282 kt | Nauru |
| 2020s | 0.0458 kt | 0.0428 kt | 0.003 kt | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Nauru or Tokelau?
- Nauru, at 0.0458 kt against 0.0352 kt in Tokelau as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Nauru and Tokelau?
- 0.0106 kt, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tokelau?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Tokelau rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Nauru ranks 217th and Tokelau ranks 219th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf