Rwanda vs Togo: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Rwanda
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 69.93 kt against 66.06 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 3.87 kt.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Togo ahead.
Rwanda ranks 135th and Togo ranks 132nd of 256 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Togo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28.07 kt | 38.37 kt | 10.3 kt | Togo |
| 2000s | 48.74 kt | 44.52 kt | 4.21 kt | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 66.97 kt | 55.9 kt | 11.08 kt | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 69.26 kt | 69.78 kt | 0.5202 kt | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Rwanda or Togo?
- Togo, at 69.93 kt against 66.06 kt in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Rwanda and Togo?
- 3.87 kt, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Togo?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Togo rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Rwanda ranks 135th and Togo ranks 132nd of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf