Serbia vs Sierra Leone: AFOLU — Emissions (CH4)
AFOLU — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 110.96 kt against 109.14 kt in Serbia, a difference of 1.82 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 123rd and Sierra Leone ranks 122nd of 256 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 158.19 kt | 79.01 kt | 79.18 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 136.39 kt | 98.67 kt | 37.72 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 122.27 kt | 102.62 kt | 19.66 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Serbia or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 110.96 kt against 109.14 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Serbia and Sierra Leone?
- 1.82 kt, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sierra Leone?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Sierra Leone rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Serbia ranks 123rd and Sierra Leone ranks 122nd of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf