Serbia vs Sweden: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Serbia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 121.59 kt against 109.14 kt in Serbia, a difference of 12.45 kt.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 123rd and Sweden ranks 120th of 256 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 158.19 kt | 146.54 kt | 11.65 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 136.39 kt | 137.31 kt | 0.921 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 122.27 kt | 123.71 kt | 1.44 kt | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Serbia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 121.59 kt against 109.14 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Serbia and Sweden?
- 12.45 kt, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sweden?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Sweden rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Serbia ranks 123rd and Sweden ranks 120th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf