Solomon Islands vs Tonga: AFOLU — Emissions (CH4)
AFOLU — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Solomon Islands
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 2.35 kt against 2.28 kt in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.07 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 189th and Tonga ranks 187th of 256 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.86 kt | 2.2 kt | 0.3435 kt | Tonga |
| 2000s | 1.99 kt | 2.23 kt | 0.24 kt | Tonga |
| 2010s | 2.22 kt | 2.29 kt | 0.0768 kt | Tonga |
| 2020s | 2.28 kt | 2.35 kt | 0.0713 kt | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Solomon Islands or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 2.35 kt against 2.28 kt in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Solomon Islands and Tonga?
- 0.07 kt, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Tonga?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Solomon Islands and Tonga rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Solomon Islands ranks 189th and Tonga ranks 187th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf