Andorra vs Slovenia: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Andorra
- Slovenia
How they compare
Andorra currently reports -220 kt against -290.86 kt in Slovenia, a difference of 70.86 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Andorra ahead.
Andorra ranks 174th and Slovenia ranks 177th of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Andorra averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Andorra | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.67 kt | -9,390 kt | 9,405 kt | Andorra |
| 2000s | -21.63 kt | -9,372 kt | 9,350 kt | Andorra |
| 2010s | -3.3 kt | 1,451 kt | 1,455 kt | Slovenia |
| 2020s | -163.17 kt | 183.04 kt | 346.21 kt | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Andorra or Slovenia?
- Andorra, at -220 kt against -290.86 kt in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Andorra and Slovenia?
- 70.86 kt, with Andorra ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Andorra and Slovenia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Andorra ranks 174th and Slovenia ranks 177th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf