Angola vs Nigeria: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Angola
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 35,743 kt against 32,669 kt in Angola, a difference of 3,074 kt.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 17th and Nigeria ranks 16th of 222 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,021 kt | 35,735 kt | 25,714 kt | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 30,432 kt | 35,735 kt | 5,303 kt | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 32,687 kt | 35,732 kt | 3,045 kt | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 32,668 kt | 35,739 kt | 3,071 kt | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Angola or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 35,743 kt against 32,669 kt in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Angola and Nigeria?
- 3,074 kt, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Nigeria?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Nigeria rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Angola ranks 17th and Nigeria ranks 16th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf