Armenia vs Jamaica: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Armenia
- Jamaica
How they compare
Armenia currently reports -491.33 kt against -1,092 kt in Jamaica, a difference of 600.67 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Jamaica ahead.
Armenia ranks 182nd and Jamaica ranks 184th of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 128.33 kt | 444.18 kt | 315.84 kt | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 98.63 kt | -2,155 kt | 2,254 kt | Armenia |
| 2010s | -577.13 kt | -71.81 kt | 505.32 kt | Jamaica |
| 2020s | -680.17 kt | -781.74 kt | 101.57 kt | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Armenia or Jamaica?
- Armenia, at -491.33 kt against -1,092 kt in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Armenia and Jamaica?
- 600.67 kt, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Jamaica?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Jamaica rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Armenia ranks 182nd and Jamaica ranks 184th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf