Austria vs Turkey: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Austria
- Turkey
How they compare
Austria currently reports -4,788 kt against -6,905 kt in Turkey, a difference of 2,117 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 231st and Turkey ranks 233rd of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Turkey in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -11,807 kt | -16,940 kt | 5,134 kt | Austria |
| 2000s | -6,536 kt | -40,357 kt | 33,822 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | -4,893 kt | -30,037 kt | 25,144 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | -4,785 kt | -2,620 kt | 2,164 kt | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Austria or Turkey?
- Austria, at -4,788 kt against -6,905 kt in Turkey as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Austria and Turkey?
- 2,117 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Turkey?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Turkey rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Austria ranks 231st and Turkey ranks 233rd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf