Czechia vs Pakistan: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Czechia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports -2,233 kt against -3,498 kt in Pakistan, a difference of 1,265 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Pakistan ahead.
Czechia ranks 223rd and Pakistan ranks 226th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -150.69 kt | 2,365 kt | 2,516 kt | Pakistan |
| 2000s | -734.83 kt | 2,487 kt | 3,222 kt | Pakistan |
| 2010s | -2,095 kt | 723.06 kt | 2,818 kt | Pakistan |
| 2020s | -2,233 kt | -3,650 kt | 1,417 kt | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Czechia or Pakistan?
- Czechia, at -2,233 kt against -3,498 kt in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Czechia and Pakistan?
- 1,265 kt, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Pakistan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Pakistan rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Czechia ranks 223rd and Pakistan ranks 226th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf