Czechia vs Uruguay: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Czechia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports -2,053 kt against -2,233 kt in Czechia, a difference of 180 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 223rd and Uruguay ranks 221st of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -150.69 kt | -6,712 kt | 6,561 kt | Czechia |
| 2000s | -734.83 kt | -8,048 kt | 7,313 kt | Czechia |
| 2010s | -2,095 kt | -5,539 kt | 3,444 kt | Czechia |
| 2020s | -2,233 kt | -1,332 kt | 901.62 kt | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Czechia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at -2,053 kt against -2,233 kt in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Czechia and Uruguay?
- 180 kt, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Uruguay?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Uruguay rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Czechia ranks 223rd and Uruguay ranks 221st of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf