Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Latin America and the Caribbean: AFOLU — Emissions

Democratic Republic of the Congo
155,217 kt
in 2023
Latin America and the Caribbean
1.30 million kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
3rd
Latin America and the Caribbean rank
2nd

AFOLU — Emissions over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Latin America and the Caribbean
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M199020062023

How they compare

Latin America and the Caribbean currently reports 1.30 million kt against 155,217 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 1.15 million kt.

That makes Latin America and the Caribbean's figure about 8.4 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Latin America and the Caribbean has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 3rd and Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 2nd of 22 countries.

Latin America and the Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Latin America and the Caribbean Difference Ahead
1990s 369,729 kt 2.12 million kt 1.75 million kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2000s 369,710 kt 1.46 million kt 1.09 million kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2010s 374,035 kt 934,116 kt 560,081 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2020s 155,216 kt 1.27 million kt 1.12 million kt Latin America and the Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher afolu — emissions, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Latin America and the Caribbean?
Latin America and the Caribbean, at 1.30 million kt against 155,217 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Latin America and the Caribbean?
1.15 million kt, with Latin America and the Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Latin America and the Caribbean?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Latin America and the Caribbean rank globally for afolu — emissions?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 3rd and Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 2nd of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Latin America and the Caribbean: AFOLU — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Latin America and the Caribbean: AFOLU — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf