Estonia vs Laos: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Estonia
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 9,878 kt against 9,075 kt in Estonia, a difference of 803 kt.
That makes Laos's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Laos ahead.
Estonia ranks 52nd and Laos ranks 49th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Laos in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -9.15 kt | 8,089 kt | 8,098 kt | Laos |
| 2000s | 1,159 kt | -55,981 kt | 57,140 kt | Estonia |
| 2010s | 1,853 kt | 10,967 kt | 9,114 kt | Laos |
| 2020s | 8,987 kt | 13,030 kt | 4,043 kt | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Estonia or Laos?
- Laos, at 9,878 kt against 9,075 kt in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Estonia and Laos?
- 803 kt, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Laos?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Laos rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Estonia ranks 52nd and Laos ranks 49th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf