Estonia vs Malawi: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Estonia
- Malawi
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 9,075 kt against 7,906 kt in Malawi, a difference of 1,169 kt.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malawi ahead.
Estonia ranks 52nd and Malawi ranks 55th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -9.15 kt | 7,912 kt | 7,921 kt | Malawi |
| 2000s | 1,159 kt | 7,939 kt | 6,780 kt | Malawi |
| 2010s | 1,853 kt | 7,929 kt | 6,076 kt | Malawi |
| 2020s | 8,987 kt | 7,906 kt | 1,081 kt | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Estonia or Malawi?
- Estonia, at 9,075 kt against 7,906 kt in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Estonia and Malawi?
- 1,169 kt, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Malawi?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Malawi rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Estonia ranks 52nd and Malawi ranks 55th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf