Ethiopia vs Latvia: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Ethiopia
- Latvia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 6,821 kt against 6,589 kt in Latvia, a difference of 232 kt.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 47th and Latvia ranks 49th of 222 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 29,317 kt | -10,502 kt | 39,819 kt | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 29,492 kt | -10,993 kt | 40,484 kt | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 18,291 kt | -3,258 kt | 21,548 kt | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 6,845 kt | 4,464 kt | 2,382 kt | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Ethiopia or Latvia?
- Ethiopia, at 6,821 kt against 6,589 kt in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Ethiopia and Latvia?
- 232 kt, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Latvia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Latvia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Ethiopia ranks 47th and Latvia ranks 49th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf