Finland vs Mexico: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Finland
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 14,418 kt against 14,036 kt in Finland, a difference of 382 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mexico ahead.
Finland ranks 42nd and Mexico ranks 41st of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -25,781 kt | 21,876 kt | 47,657 kt | Mexico |
| 2000s | -10,654 kt | -55,179 kt | 44,525 kt | Finland |
| 2010s | -26,922 kt | -10,437 kt | 16,485 kt | Mexico |
| 2020s | 9,459 kt | 14,418 kt | 4,959 kt | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Finland or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 14,418 kt against 14,036 kt in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Finland and Mexico?
- 382 kt, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mexico?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Mexico rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Finland ranks 42nd and Mexico ranks 41st of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf