Kuwait vs Kyrgyzstan: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Kuwait
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 109th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 109th of 222 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -18.33 kt | -1,019 kt | 1,001 kt | Kuwait |
| 2000s | -5.13 kt | -85.43 kt | 80.3 kt | Kuwait |
| 2010s | -11.37 kt | -1,150 kt | 1,139 kt | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 0 kt | -502.33 kt | 502.33 kt | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Kuwait or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kuwait, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Kuwait and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0 kt, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Kuwait ranks 109th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 109th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf