Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: AFOLU — Emissions

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
280,458 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
63,646 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th

AFOLU — Emissions over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 280,458 kt against 63,646 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 216,812 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 4.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 32 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 359,979 kt 55,517 kt 304,462 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 260,900 kt 55,492 kt 205,408 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 316,419 kt 58,728 kt 257,691 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 291,525 kt 63,654 kt 227,871 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher afolu — emissions, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 280,458 kt against 63,646 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
216,812 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for afolu — emissions?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: AFOLU — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/afolu-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: AFOLU — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
AFOLU — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf