Malawi vs South Sudan: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Malawi
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 9,041 kt against 7,906 kt in Malawi, a difference of 1,135 kt.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 55th and South Sudan ranks 53rd of 257 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7,924 kt | 9,262 kt | 1,338 kt | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 7,906 kt | 9,164 kt | 1,259 kt | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Malawi or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 9,041 kt against 7,906 kt in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Malawi and South Sudan?
- 1,135 kt, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and South Sudan rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Malawi ranks 55th and South Sudan ranks 53rd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf